Gem State Roundup

Idaho Water Resource Board extends public comment on criteria for evaluating water projects 

By: - September 13, 2022 4:00 am
Anderson Ranch Dam

The Anderson Ranch Dam Enlargement is on the Idaho Water Resource Board’s Tier 1 list for priority water projects that have been identified as a project with potential basin-wide, regional, or state-wide benefits. (Courtesy of the Bureau of Reclamation)

The Idaho Department of Water Resource’s Finance Board voted Thursday to extend the public comment period for feedback on the criteria that will be used to evaluate water projects for a project priority list. 

The board’s vote extends the public comment period an additional 30 days, through Oct. 11, according to a press release issued by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. 

The evaluation criteria are available on the Idaho Department of Water Resources website, starting on the third page of materials from Thursday’s meeting. Idahoans can also view the board’s Regional Water Sustainability Project list online.

Public comments can be submitted via email to board staff member Neeley Miller at [email protected]

Idaho Department of Water Resources officials said projects that qualify for the priority list creates recognition that the project has the potential to achieve water sustainability, although qualifying for the priority list itself does not represent a specific funding commitment.

SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site.

Clark Corbin
Clark Corbin

Clark Corbin has more than a decade of experience covering Idaho government and politics. He has covered every Idaho legislative session since 2011 gavel-to-gavel. Prior to joining the Idaho Capital Sun he reported for the Idaho Falls Post Register and Idaho Education News. His reporting in Idaho has helped uncover a multimillion-dollar investment scam and exposed inaccurate data that school districts submitted to the state.

MORE FROM AUTHOR