In this file photo, a patient receives her booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine during an Oakland County Health Department vaccination clinic at the Southfield Pavilion on Aug. 24, 2021, in Southfield, Michigan. Oakland County was the second county in Michigan to reach the state’s goal of vaccinating 70% of its population. (Emily Elconin/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON — Many private employers beginning in January will have to ensure their workers either are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or that they will undergo weekly testing and wear a face covering, under a new federal rule announced Thursday by the White House.
The policy from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is set to affect 84 million workers across the U.S. Employers who refuse to comply could face hefty fines.
Final details of the new rule were released almost two months after President Joe Biden announced the vaccination requirement for all private companies with at least 100 employees.
Other workers also must comply with new vaccination rules.
Another 17 million health care providers at 76,000 facilities participating in the federal Medicare and Medicaid health insurance programs must be vaccinated under a separate policy announced Thursday. Those health care workers will not have the option of weekly tests.
Federal contractors also must ensure their employees are vaccinated, under another rule announced earlier this week. That requirement had been set to kick in Dec. 8, but Thursday’s announcement by the White House stated that all three of the vaccination requirements will go into effect on Jan. 4.
Senior Biden administration officials who briefed reporters Wednesday evening touted vaccination requirements already in place by private companies and local governments as having slashed the number of unvaccinated Americans by nearly 40%.
The new OSHA rule will save thousands of lives and prevent hospitalizations, they argued.
But the policy has already sparked vocal outcry and legal challenges from Republicans, including those from Idaho.
The Idaho Legislature will reconvene Nov. 15 to address Biden’s COVID-19 rules for employers and consider an ethics complaint against Rep. Priscilla Giddings, Speaker of the House Scott Bedke said Oct. 25. The State Board of Education voted Tuesday to comply with the far-reaching executive order for now, but also signed onto a lawsuit against it.
“We are working together with our lawyers as well as with the Attorney General’s Office and the Governor’s Office as we work with other states to find an appropriate response to the mandates from the Biden administration,” Bedke said in a telephone interview in October.
“I believe this is overreach,” he added.
On Thursday, Idaho Gov. Brad Little reiterated in a statement that he and other Idaho political leaders urged Biden in September to listen to concerns relating to a federal vaccine and testing mandate on private businesses.
“Not surprisingly, President Biden is plowing forward with his OSHA rule to punish America’s businesses – yet another unprecedented federal overreach into the private sector,” Little said. “I have been actively working with Attorney General Lawrence Wasden and my legal team, and we will join a multistate lawsuit Friday to stop this latest attempt to force the private sector to police President Biden’s vaccine mandates.”
Little announced last week he signed onto another multistate lawsuit challenging Biden’s vaccine mandates for federal contractors.
Before the new rules will fully go into effect, officials in 21 states that enforce their own workplace safety rules also will need to take action.
Those states — which include Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Minnesota, Iowa, Michigan, Tennessee, North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland — will have 30 days to approve their own policies that are at least as stringent as the new federal policy.
The rule does not require employers to provide or pay for tests for those who are not vaccinated, but they may be required to do so under other laws or agreements with unions.
Potential fines for not complying
Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 means receiving both doses of the two-shot vaccine from either Pfizer or Moderna, or getting the one-shot version from Johnson & Johnson. (The booster doses recently approved for some Americans are not required to be considered fully vaccinated.)
The new OSHA rule also requires employers to provide paid time off for workers to get vaccinated and recover from any side effects. That policy, and another requiring unvaccinated workers to wear a face mask, will go into effect on Dec. 5.
Refusing to comply could mean fines for the employer.
Federal OSHA officials say the cost would depend on the number and magnitude of any violations, but a single violation could bring a fine of nearly $14,000 — and those deemed to be “willful” could cost as much as $136,000.
Hospitals or long-term care facilities that do not comply with the vaccination requirement for their workers also could face penalties from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Facilities could be fined, denied federal payments or even removed from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. But federal officials emphasized that they will be seeking first to bring any negligent businesses and health care providers into compliance.
Timing the vaccination requirement to kick in after the December holidays is intended to make it easier for businesses and workers to comply, according to the Biden administration.
But administration officials said they hope that employers will not wait until the deadline approaches to begin enforcement.
As employers prepare to comply with the new federal workplace rules, legal battles over the vaccination mandate will be playing out in the court system.
Republican attorneys general from 19 states, including Idaho’s Lawrence Wasden, already have filed four separate lawsuits arguing that the vaccination requirement for federal contractors violates federal law.
Iowa, Missouri, Montana, and New Hampshire have signed on to one lawsuit filed in a federal district court in Missouri. Another involves a group of states that includes Georgia, Idaho, and Kansas. Florida officials also have filed their own lawsuit.
Several dozen Republican U.S. senators also have said they will seek to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn the new regulation. But that effort is unlikely to succeed because it would require a resolution to pass both Democratic-controlled chambers and be signed by the president.
This story includes previous Idaho Capital Sun reporting.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.